Open Letter to Dr. Gregory Postel, M.D., Interim President, University of Toledo

Dear Dr. Postel,

We, in the Save UTMC group, wish you a warm welcome to Toledo!

We are very pleased that the University of Toledo (UToledo) Board selected you and believe that, based on your background, you are strongly prepared to address the serious problems faced by the UToledo academic medical center and UToledo.

As you are aware, the UToledo academic medical center, located on the Health Sciences Campus in South Toledo, includes the College of Medicine and Life Sciences (COMLS) research buildings and classrooms, the University of Toledo Medical Center (UTMC), the Dana Cancer Center, the Orthopedics Center, and the George Isaac Minimally Invasive Surgery Center.

A key concern of Save UTMC is that, since the merger between the UToledo and the Medical College of Ohio, there has not been a single member on the UToledo Board of Trustees who had any familiarity with academic medical centers.

We believe that mediocre UToledo leadership of the academic medical center was exacerbated following the 2015 UToledo/ProMedica Affiliation agreement. The Affiliation Agreement was initially enthusiastically supported by UToledo. However, within two years, the Academic Affiliation Organizing Group (AAOG) began to make decisions that severely harmed the solvency of UTMC, the education and research capability of UToledo COMLS, and the metrics that affect ranking of COMLS, especially NIH-funding. Unfortunately, there were no UToledo Board members who could properly evaluate the wisdom of these harmful decisions.

As an example of poor decisions made by the AAOG, following the Affiliation the AAOG decided to eliminate resident and medical student education at UTMC. As a consequence, education and research opportunities for medical students and residents have markedly decreased.

Further, the financial solvency of UTMC was severely harmed by transfer of many faculty and residents to Toledo Hospital with no plan to replace with community physicians. UTMC solvency was further harmed by UToledo Board decisions to levy extraordinary and inappropriate overhead expenses on UTMC in order to address financial shortfalls in other UToledo departments. As you may have heard, this issue is now the subject of currently ongoing audits.

Moreover, COMLS funding to support NIH-funded research, including recruitment of faculty capable of writing NIH grants, actually decreased. Since the Affiliation began in 2015, only $5 million/year has been spent by COMLS to recruit faculty, remodeled labs, and purchase equipment. This is significantly lower than in the years prior to the affiliation!

Thus, there are many issues, specific to academic medical centers, that have grown over the years without effective intervention.

The Save UTMC group, comprising doctors, nurses, elected officials and citizens, looks forward to working with you to find appropriate management solutions to these problems. As we do so, we are confident that UToledo and South Toledo will benefit from your experience, skill, and judgment.

Sincerely,

Representative of the Save UTMC Coalition

Teresa Fedor, Ohio State Senator
Paula Hicks-Hudson, Ohio State Representative and former Mayor of City of Toledo
Matt Cherry, President, Toledo City Council
Rob Ludeman, At-Large Councilman, Toledo City Council
Carty Finkbeiner, former Mayor, City of Toledo
Kevin Dalton, President, Toledo Federation of Teachers
Theresa M. Gabriel, Executive Board, NAACP and former Toledo City Councilman
James C. Willey, M.D., Professor of Medicine
Randy Desposito, President, AFSCME Local #2425
Shaun Enright, President, Greater NWO AFL-CIO
Eric Zgodsonski, MPH, Health Commissioner, Toledo-Lucas County Health Department
John McSweeney, Ph.D., Professor of Psychiatry
Honorary Chair, Marcy Kaptur, U.S. Representative

UTMC and ProMedica: Quo vadis?

Note: this letter was published in the June 19, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

On June 10, ProMedica delivered a response to the University of Toledo’s Request for Proposals to purchase, lease, or co-manage its financially burdened medical center: University of Toledo Medical Center, the former Medical College of Ohio hospital.

The announcement of the proposal, while brief, appears to have several attractive features. It allows retention of some specialty-care programs including cardiology, neurology, oncology, psychiatry, and orthopedics as well as emergency care and primary care.

Thus, these services will continue to be available to South Toledo residents. In addition, the proposal allows UTMC employees to retain their status within the state retirement system. Furthermore, it endorses support of research infrastructure at UTMC. Moreover, it promises that the UT College of Medicine and Life Sciences will continue to have “a home of its own” for educating future generations of physicians and other health-care professionals given that UT will retain ownership and ultimate control. On the other hand, the proposal at this time is incomplete, and there are several aspects that raise concerns. As is often said “The devil is in the details.”

First, the extent and comprehensiveness of the specialty services to remain at or restored to UTMC are unclear. Will the services be comprehensive as they were before they were moved to ProMedica Toledo Hospital or will they be at a “skeletal” level? UTMC’s remunerative services must restored in order for it to be financially stable.

The proposal does not mention the future of the Trauma Center, which was downgraded last year from Level One to Level Three. This decision should be reversed so that the Trauma Center is upgraded to Level Two at a minimum, preferably a Level One.

Also unclear is UTMC’s future identity. Will UTMC remain identified as the University of Toledo’s medical center or will it be “wrapped in the green and white banner of ProMedica” as suggested by a recent article in The Blade?

Also important is the question of the management structure: Who will be charge of and responsible for what? As several commentators have noted the UT’s Board of Trustees, the group ultimately responsible for UTMC’s management, has lacked medical and health-care expertise. Accordingly, an independent board with medical and health-care expertise for the UT Health Science Campus, including UTMC, has been suggested by many.

Likewise, ProMedica, as a financially oriented health-care organization, lacks expertise and experience in managing an academic enterprise, in which education and research are paramount. As noted by UT Psychiatry faculty members Daniel Rapport and Thomas Fine in a recent Blade essay, the nature of medical education requires that clinician faculty members spend sufficient time with students to explain the reasons behind the diagnosis and treatment of the patients they see.

This educational necessity may not be compatible with a business-oriented approach to health care which requires maximizing the number of reimbursable patient encounters in a given period of time. How will this potential incompatibility be resolved? Medical research represents a second academic mission that requires a set of expertise, resources, and infrastructure that are not routinely found among ProMedica’s resources.

Whatever management structure is envisioned it should be kept in mind that UTMC is a public asset responsible to the people of Ohio. This requires transparency that has been sorely lacking in the actions of the UT Board of Trustees and Administration, as well as in the UT-ProMedica Academic Affiliation Operating Group. This must change.

A final question is where will this collaboration lead? Will the goal be to assist UT to eventually become financially and structurally independent or will it lead to a UTMC becoming chronically dependent on ProMedica such that it is absorbed into the ProMedica organization?

Quo vadis?

In summary, as a 39-year faculty member at the Medical College of Ohio and the University of Toledo, as well as a member of the MCOH/​UTMC Medical staff, I believe the ProMedica proposal has the potential to provide benefits to UTMC’s missions of health care, education, and medical research if it is implemented in manner that addresses UTMC’s academic and public health-care missions and leads to it once again becoming a true university medical center. Of course, if wrongly implemented it could be the death knell for UTMC as an academic medical center.

On balance the proposal merits further analysis and discussion. I think I can speak for my colleagues when I write that I look forward to details and trust that all interested parties, including faculty members, employees, and members of the Toledo community, will be involved in the planning of this joint enterprise should it be the proposal chosen by the UT Board of Trustees.

A. John McSweeny is a professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Toledo.

Kaptur: An open letter to Gov. Mike DeWine

Note: this letter was published in the June 14, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

Thank you, Governor DeWine, for caring so deeply about the health and fate of Ohioans as you address the Covid-19 pandemic, which began to bear down here in late March. In contrast to your leadership, the University of Toledo‘s Board, a few weeks into Covid-19, made the unsettling, callous decision to publicly announce the proposed sale or transfer of our region’s only public university medical teaching hospital — the sole, anchor teaching institution for academic medical education and research in the entire northwest quarter of Ohio.

Our future doctors and medical professionals learn there. Can you imagine the shudder that ill-timed board announcement sent down the spines of thousands of medical personnel that report to work in that hospital and on that precious campus? They hold the 24/​7 responsibility to meet our region’s medical needs, refusing no patient, so life can conquer death. Their work became more stressful as they reported to the front lines to combat an illness for which there is yet no known cure.

Yet, did the UToledo Board even consider the added worry its announcement engendered in these essential medical personnel? Further, did the board give any consideration as to how their ill-timed dictum would impact the morale of thousands upon thousands more worried patients who call UTMC, the former Medical College of Ohio Hospital, their medical home?

Sadly, this dense mentality of the current board of this state university toward its medical campus and hospital is highly troubling. It is antithetical to the generous, founding spirit that first inspired and created this hard-fought, precious state academic medical college as an educational resource for our medically underserved region in December, 1964 —161 years after the state of Ohio’s founding. UTMC became Ohio’s youngest public medical college, and still one of only six statewide. A priceless, caring community of medical professionals began to emerge where none had existed before. UTMC’s teaching hospital is one of only two state authorized academic medical colleges, with Ohio State being the other.

Next, to make matters worse, the current president of UT then surprisingly announced her departure, three years before her contract was up for renewal. Compensated at the highest salary of any public official across our region and afforded many other benefits like housing and family tuition, she chose to depart, as thousands of university faculty, personnel, and students were reeling because of uncertainty about Covid-19. They wondered what the future held for them as the university shut down its classes, graduation ceremonies, and activities.

Governor DeWine, our Toledo community needs a visionary University of Toledo Board. We need a new president who cares about Toledo, its people, and our region. Our health challenges are substantial. Our University needs your informed intervention, starting with enlightened appointments to its board who live in and care about our community. Our medical university requires a separate state-appointed board like that of Ohio State.

We well understand that the medical fate of millions of Ohioans rests in your hands. But you inherited a state that ranks very low in health outcomes — in the bottom 10 percent of our nation, alongside Mississippi and South Carolina. Ohioans deserve better. The future of the University of Toledo’s academic medical center, its teaching hospital, and research campus hang in the balance, intricately bound to the Toledo’s region’s future and its health.

For far too long, your predecessors did not appreciate the hard struggle this state medical school has endured — first, to exist, and then to crawl forward to become a respected teaching and research hospital with acknowledged proficiencies in orthopedics, cancer treatment, neurology, cardiac surgery, and pharmacological expertise, to name a few.

Former presidents and faculty have devoted their lives to creating this medical community that trains doctors and medical practitioners for the future and conducts our highest level of medical research. Most recently, it was seven UTMC young female scientists who created the original Covid-19 test kits supplied to doctors across our region. We applaud them! Why hasn’t the university board?

You now inherit the challenges that emanate from decisions made by your predecessors that do not serve the public interest. I believe it incumbent for the state of Ohio to delve into the series of decisions that have led to the current, unfortunate, destabilizing predicament at the University of Toledo Medical Center. Nontransparent UToledo Board actions threaten to further harm our medically underserved region. The campus is located in the heart of Toledo proximate to census tracts with high percentages of minority populations and senior citizens. Please know, the diverse patient profile of the UTMC medical center is 75 percent Medicare/​Medicaid.

Meanwhile, many of the board and key decision makers driving this UTMC sell-off do not live in Toledo. They live outside Toledo, and even outside Lucas County, but leverage Toledo’s assets to enrich their interests. The University of Toledo should reflect the diverse culture of Toledo, its caring heart, and its international bent as a major port city on the Great Lakes. The upending of fine medical care at UTMC not only must stop, it must be reversed. The people of our community cannot afford to lose this medical community located in the heart of Toledo. It has been built with love by those who devoted their dear lives to creating it and building it forward for us to yield better health outcomes for all.

Certain critical facts need to be assembled to forge a sound pathway forward.

But first, a forensic audit of UTMC history is essential. The public, and you, have a right to know the net worth of decades of taxpayer public investment on the UTMC medical research campus and its teaching hospital. Painstakingly, over time, those on the medical campus have earned their way forward with real investment amounting to well over a billion dollars. Yes, progress occurred.

I believe new university partnerships can be struck to create a sterling state medical facility complex to meet the health-care needs of our region. For instance, UTMC could partner with Bowling Green State University, its Firelands campus, and the Erie County Health Department to inform medical outcomes in underserved rural counties that surround Toledo, employing telemedicine and other means. With the concurrence of our state, our region can create its own “research triangle model,” ultimately serving a vast underserved tristate region.

But all decisions forward must be informed by a real audit of UTMC’s worth, not simply revenue flows in a given year, especially an atypical year like 2020. Internal year-to-year shifts in flows of funds relative to the medical university vs. main campus, especially over the past decade, must be evaluated.

Full transparency in a state public institution is essential. Nothing should be hidden. It appears some current revenue statements mask interfund transfers within the university structure itself, especially post 2015. These transfers must be tracked over time and presented publicly. A one-year snapshot is inadequate to the challenge at hand.

The auditing process the state must undertake should respect the taxpaying public, those medical professionals earning revenues by providing medical services, private philanthropists that helped build forward this critical academic medical campus and its teaching hospital, and public officials like myself whose votes in Congress have brought millions of dollars to the medical campus.

When governors Jim Rhodes and Mike DiSalle envisioned this youngest medical campus in Ohio, they knew how medically in need this corner of Ohio was. As a child, I still remember going into the old County hospital with my father to visit our grandfather. I learned firsthand how insufficient, even dreadful, it was. UTMC, formerly the Medical College of Ohio, was a dream imagined by visionary, educated citizens like Paul Block, Jr., whose inspired leadership for a medical school and research capacity in neglected northwest Ohio is legendary.

As Ohio nationally ranks among the 10 to 20 worst-performing states in our nation in terms of health outcomes, I strongly have urged your Chancellor of Higher Education, Randy Gardner, to seriously evaluate how federal support being directed to Ohio relating to Covid-19 — including in both education and health accounts — could assist Ohio’s six public medical universities and its two teaching hospitals to improve their performance and reach. Ours, as the youngest medical university, has to stretch not retrench, nor sell its silverware. In addition, our region must be highly mindful that significant anti-trust concerns attend to any proposal regarding medical services in this region, as the Federal Trade Commission has a watchful eye on the Toledo market based on recent rulings.

In looking toward the future, please let me share with you further examples of how the University of Toledo Medical Center and hospital could embrace opportunities to augment its depth and reach.

● Veterans. There exists a federally supported veterans’ clinic at UTMC.

It took our painstaking efforts over two decades to appropriate federal funding to construct this full-service Veterans’ Clinic in Toledo. The goal was to create a “dual affiliation” for the Veterans Administration with both the University of Toledo Medical Center, as well as currently with the University of Michigan/​Ann Arbor V.A. Unfortunately, and oddly, this dual affiliation has never been a priority for the University of Toledo. Far too many of our veterans must travel to Ann Arbor for treatments that would be more humanely provided here.

A dual affiliation would make it easier for UTMC to provide hospital care closer to home, as the new V.A. Mission Act encourages, as well as draw down V.A. research funds and place residents for training within the VA. Our region, based on the number of our citizens who served in the U.S. military, is more than worthy of such a dual status.

● Research linkages. With the Red Cross blood facility co-located with UTMC on Research Drive on campus, collaborative research should be pursued. With millions of federal support dollars having built this regional blood bank that serves our tristate area, literally hundreds of medical locations across our tristate area are accessed. Our medical campus could become a significant research node with the Red Cross for research on blood components, and even the development of vaccines.

This has never been developed. Why?

●Ohio National Guard. For many years, I worked with the Ohio National Guard, at the urging of Sen. John Glenn, to secure a medical trauma mission on campus because it had a renowned trauma center. The United States military needs additional medical proficiency lodged in our Guard units across the country to meet medical shortages at home and abroad, including in theater.

Ultimately, the Ohio National Guard decided to create a facility on Research Drive, but peculiarly assigned our campus an MP unit instead.

It seems such an unusual decision and did not fulfill the medical-mission objective to which UTMC is well-suited. Perhaps as you evaluate Guard medical asset placement, you might help us better meet the medical needs of our military here.

● School of Pharmacy. The University of Toledo operates the only major pharmacy school across all of northern Ohio. I believe it a perfect location to spur the “making of medicine” and have urged UT leadership for almost two decades to seek opportunities to spin off medicines and pharmacological products in Toledo to meet human need. That effort would also create new jobs and potentially offer products at more affordable prices to consumers compared to other entries in the marketplace.

One former provost, astoundingly, advised me that making insulin, for example, would be very difficult because you have to refrigerate it. I informed him we build refrigeration equipment in this region. With more than 2 million diabetics or prediabetics in Ohio, surely our state has a crying need to address this epidemic.

● Intercollege collaboration. The University of Toledo’s medical relevance can be enhanced by intercollege collaboration. For example, UT’s Engineering School is world class. As sciences blend, health-care remedies can develop from collaboration between engineering, physics, chemistry, and medicine. The Toledo region has a higher than average orthopedic injury patient base due to the nature of work across our region.

With the assets already existing on campus, including its adjacent rehab hospital, new technologies and medical assists can be invented to repair nerve and spinal cord injuries as research advances in bioengineering, neurology, energy, and bone-tissue science.

● Research with live agricultural and wildlife species collections. Many recent human-health threats, like Covid-19, have emerged from the wild kingdom. The University of Toledo Medical Center is located proximate to our state’s only federal wildlife refuges, and to the famous Toledo Zoo.

Doctors from the university already perform operations on zoo species. Nationally, there is a shortage of doctors in veterinary sciences in demand across our nation and state. UTMC should expand its platform to embrace medical education in conjunction with our agricultural and zoological communities.

Many decades ago, I worked with UTMC President Frank McCollough and farmers from our region to develop sterile hogs whose valves are now being transplanted in human beings at UTMC as well as patients across this country. That represents real medical progress. Pivoting off that experience, there are endless possibilities for UTMC to perform consequential research — linking to our surrounding agricultural community, wildlife refuges, and the science campus collections at the Toledo Zoological Society with its wild animal species, medicinal plants, and botanical conservatory.

● Innovation. In order to earn additional revenue for UTMC, I have suggested to medical professionals at the university they begin to patent and license more of their medical innovations that researchers and practitioners there conceive.

I was informed by one specialty that that was unnecessary because a major pharmaceutical firm visits the University every year, sponsors a lunch, and asks attendees for their suggestions. So the practitioners freely share their ideas with that particular company that then walks away with their intellectual property.

UTMC personnel didn’t appreciate how valuable their knowledge is. I urged them to set up a process within the university to patent, trademark, and license their ideas. UTMC must spearhead health innovations.

● Telemedicine regionally and internationally. With the construction of the SIM Center, the University developed the awesome capability to teach medicine, even beyond its borders. This could include not only a broader linkage across our region, but internationally.

UTMC doctors have brought modern medicine abroad through “medical missions” to some of the most forgotten places on Earth. I believe with the number of UTMC’s internationally capable medical students and doctors and nurses, and with our region’s language capabilities and cultural diversity, our region can teach medicine globally.

I have visited places in Lebanon, Egypt, Israel, the West Bank, Vietnam, Ukraine, and many more where UTMC could improve medical outcomes globally.

● Neighborhood health association and county health departments. Every year, federal support flows to our region for nearly two dozen neighborhood health clinics. Over time, these clinics have developed into critical intake sites for underserved populations. With the onset of Covid-19, additional federal funds have been disbursed to the Neighborhood Health Association to address the underserved. It may be the appropriate time for UTMC to begin discussions with NHA to create a campus presence for NHA activity.

Our region is in serious need of family practice physicians and registered nurse practitioners. This affiliation could be mutually beneficial. In addition, closer linkage to county health departments in northwest Ohio — even presence on campus — could inform new research related to local health outcomes.

In sum, what is needed:

● A futuristic UTMC vision for our state academic medical campus and its teaching hospital, modeled on Ohio State, including its own separate medical advisory board.

● A forensic audit with a stay on further University of Toledo Board decisions regarding the status of UTMC and its Teaching Hospital pending the audit results.

● Appointments of an experienced, community-committed president and locally knowledgeable UT board members, including several appointees with a passion for medical education and teaching, interdepartmental research collaboration, and a desire to take UTMC’s medical teaching and healing more broadly regionally and globally.

● Recruitment of local candidates who have lived and excelled in Toledo, but with experience elsewhere, to interview for the position of University of Toledo President, along with others who have no local experience.

● A research triangle perspective across our region for new partnerships and collaboration on UTMC-led medical research, innovation, and advanced academic medical education.

Blade Editorial: Gov. DeWine must intervene on UTMC

Note: this editorial was published in the June 7, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

It looked like a good deal. At least it looked good on paper five years ago.

The University of Toledo College of Medicine would get money and expanded research opportunities it needed. And ProMedica would get a partner in creating an academic medical center that included its hospitals.

But the reality of the partnership didn’t live up to the terms of that deal, at least not for UTMC.

Five years later, UT officials say UTMC, the former Medical College of Ohio Hospital, lost about $14.8 million through February of the fiscal year. And now the public hospital is up for sale, its continued existence in doubt.

When the UTMC-ProMedica deal was struck in 2015, then-Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine’s office reviewed the proposal and found no antitrust concerns.

But five years later antitrust issues are apparent to the naked eye. ProMedica has systematically removed the money-making enterprises based at UTMC, transferring them to its flagship Toledo Hospital. What remains in South Toledo is a shell of its former self, destined for the auction block.

As state Sen. Theresa Fedor said in calling on state regulators to conduct a forensic audit and put the brakes on the sale of UTMC, which is a public institution, “ProMedica got the gold mine, the public got the shaft.”

Gov. Mike DeWine must intervene in this mess. State regulators must revisit the affiliation agreement and consider not just what it aimed to do, but what it has actually done to UTMC, to the medical school, to South Toledo, and to a public hospital about to be sold to the highest bidder.

As attorney general, Mr. DeWine left open the possibility that the regulators could reconsider the agreement if the deal led to anti-competitiveness in purpose or effect. The situation has clearly reached a point where this is necessary.

It’s possible that with sharper oversight — any oversight — from University of Toledo trustees who should have been looking out for UTMC’s interests in the last five years, the affiliation agreement could have been a fair bargain for both sides.

In reality, however, it’s been the healthcare industry equivalent of a car-heist ring — scooping up a vulnerable mark and stripping it for parts before shipping the skeletal remains to a junk yard.

UTMC’s medical college — one of Toledo’s crown jewels — cannot prosper, and possibly cannot survive, without its hospital. So what has been taken must be returned, with interest. Only the governor can begin that process.

That is a rotten deal and it is anticompetitive by definition. It cannot be allowed to happen.

UTMC: A community of caring healers with caring hearts

by Carty Finkbeiner, former Mayor of Toledo

Note: this essay was published in the May 10, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

The University of Toledo Medical Center, critical to health care, research, and learning, is facing financial stress. Ironically, many causes of this problem are self-inflicted. Fortunately, solutions are developing. But the University of Toledo Board of Trustees and our South Toledo community must work together closely and decisively to implement sound and visionary solutions for our academic medical campus and hospital.

Blame for the fiscal straits in which UTMC finds itself is being liberally passed around by UT leadership: trends are changing in hospital treatments, they say; the physical hospital is too small, they claim; Toledo has too many hospital beds, they state.

The real number one problem at UTMC is that doctors, their patients, the revenue generated by both, and important UTMC programs have been moved to ProMedica Toledo Hospital.

Why? Because an Academic Affiliation Agreement between the UT College of Medicine and Life Sciences (COMLS) and ProMedica was authored, signed, and entered into in 2015 by one individual, Dr. Christopher Cooper, who served three leadership roles simultaneously in his employment with the University of Toledo. At the time of the agreement, Dr. Cooper was Executive VP of Clinical Affairs at UT, CEO of the University of Toledo Physicians Group, and was dean of the University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences.

If anyone had a vested interest in maintaining the market strength and fiscal integrity of UTMC, it should have been Dr. Cooper. Instead, it was Dr. Cooper who began pushing doctors, patients, programs, and their associated revenue to ProMedica Toledo Hospital, creating disastrous voids on the medical campus he is paid to serve. That is a real conflict of interest that has served UTMC quite badly. Some might say this is akin to a leveraged buyout or a hostile takeover of a public asset by private interests.

We can only imagine what UT and ProMedica were thinking. It should have been obvious to anyone, especially University of Toledo leadership, that the outcome of the Academic Affiliation Agreement with ProMedica would cause the ultimate demise of UTMC and the Health Science Campus.

Because Dr. Cooper wrote the Affiliation Agreement, he must accept major responsibility for the financial shortfall, as well as the physician exodus UTMC is experiencing. By his actions, UTMC benefits little; indeed, ProMedica is being built up at the expense of UTMC.

There is a provision for arbitration in the Academic Affiliation Agreement between the University of Toledo College of Medicine and ProMedica should either party have concerns regarding the direction it was taking. The agreement must be placed on hold now and renegotiated to prevent further residents and physicians from being transferred, until a stable solution for UTMC is identified.

A second powerful solution to the drain of physicians from UTMC is now in place. Following pressure from the Save UTMC Coalition, a bylaw blocking nonfaculty physicians from practicing at UTMC is no more.

I have hope for a new partnership with The Toledo Clinic. This potential partnership, however, does not address the loss of the clinical programs at UTMC. We have an excellent teaching campus in South Toledo. Why is it being transferred to ProMedica?

UT officials, and Randy Oostra, CEO of ProMedica, must recognize that the five-year-old Affiliation Agreement between the two organizations is building up Toledo Hospital, while tearing down the historic former Medical College of Ohio. The Save UTMC Coalition certainly recognizes this power and money grab for what it is.S. Amjad HussainUT has few choices over fate of UTMC

The leaders mentioned above need to search their civic hearts. Mr. Oostra, a recognized community leader, must remember the important achievement that early MCO-UTMC leadership accomplished as a team by bringing the Medical College of Ohio to Toledo.

These civic leaders formed a campus for teaching bright young men and women from all over the world who yearned to be doctors or nurses. Many of these young men and women are now permanent residents of northwest Ohio. Presidents, board members, and doctors and nurses not only taught and researched and healed on the MCO campus by day, but by evening they attended various community meetings and participated in the problem-solving Toledo needed to move forward.

Mike DeWine, our governor, will certainly want to be involved in planning our future as our South Toledo campus and hospital have very large chunks of State of Ohio money invested. U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur has made it clear that the hospital should not be on the market until a forensic audit, going back a decade, has been conducted. Congressman Kaptur has been joined in this request of the governor by State Sen. Teresa Fedor, State Reps. Paula Hicks-Hudson and Mike Sheehy, Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz, Toledo City Council, and the Save UTMC Coalition. Thousands of Toledoans have signed a petition asking for the same.

Serious consideration must be given to putting in place a Board of Directors or Advisory Board of men and women with medical, research, and teaching experience. The absence of individuals on the present UT Board of Trustees with experience related to the work being done on the UTMC Campus is testimony to the disappointing decision-making that has led to the fragile fiscal condition of UTMC today.

Fresh money is needed!

What is needed even more: strong leadership standing firmly against the ProMedica commandeering of our Medical Campus — a campus that has contributed as much to Toledoans’ health and wellness as ProMedica ever has.

Carty Finkbeiner is a former mayor of Toledo.

Blade editorial: Opportunities at UT

I think Ms. Gaber’s departure presents UT and greater Toledo with at least three major opportunities.

Reversing its current stance and saving and securing the medical college is the first opportunity (see today’s lead editorial).

The trustees must then market the medical college and its teaching hospital, which has never really been done. They must also aggressively and effectively market the entire university, which has also never really been done.

Click here to read the full editorial

Blade Editorial: What next at UT?

Note: this editorial was published in the May 3, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

President Sharon Gaber has resigned, and the University of Toledo is again without a president. Why can’t we get and keep a good president? That seems to be the self-flagellating question circulating around the campus and the city at the moment.

Ms. Gaber’s fans will say she was a good administrator.

Her critics will say, perhaps so, but she was not a particularly creative or courageous leader.

Both things could be true.

Others will focus on whether her new job was too good to refuse or an escape; a step up or lateral. (It seems to be a step up but a small one.)

But Ms. Gaber is gone, no matter how one assesses her tenure. The question is: How does UT move forward and by doing so move Toledo forward?

The first thing that must happen is that the UT board of trustees must be challenged, for the board remains in place, and its record in recent years is not one of dynamic or careful leadership.

Does the board have a vision for the future of the university?

Does it have a vision, or a 5 or 10-year plan, for the medical college?

The board’s first duty is to recommit to the future of the medical college and stabilize the university hospital. The hospital and the UTMC campus have been depopulated, and the hospital is now for sale.

The trustees should reverse course, cancel the proposed sale, and make a plan for the hospital. It would be an act of the utmost irresponsibility, and ultimately of self-destruction, for the university as whole, to throw away an academic hospital. UT is one of only two public universities in Ohio that has this precious asset. Ohio State University is the other.

And it is a precious asset to have a teaching hospital attached to your medical school. Think of George Washington in Washington or Johns Hopkins in Baltimore.

The University of Connecticut infused its teaching hospital, only an hour from all of New Haven’s outstanding hospitals, with new buildings, equipment, and faculty a few years ago. It did not close it or sell it or pluck it dry.

Yes, ProMedica is a great organization that has done much for Toledo. But it does not run an academic hospital.

The hospital must be revivified and to a certain extent re-created. Can it affiliate with another research institution? Can it make service to veterans its focus?

The UT board must not only lead but think.

A step toward both would be to form a separate board to oversee the medical college. It should be made up of individuals who know medicine and medical science, as well as health-care economics. These people exist in northwest Ohio and most would be willing to serve.

This UT board’s first task should be to make a plan to save the UTMC hospital and, thus, assure the future of the medical school.

Letter to UT Board of Trustees

Dear Trustees:

We write in response to the recent announcement that President Gaber is leaving the University of Toledo. We thank her for the last five years of service and wish her well in her next endeavor.

Understanding the importance of the decision this board must make in choosing her replacement, we advise the creation of a citizen advisory committee. This committee would ensure transparency and allow for public input throughout the recruitment process. The board and the university have been under public scrutiny because of work being done behind closed doors in regards to the University of Toledo Medical Center. Including the public in this decision will reestablish public trust and confidence in this board and its processes.

The next leader of the university must understand the value this public institution adds to the community and the importance of its responsibility for citizens. The best candidate should have experience in an urban university setting that can partner with the community to develop the most resources for the Toledo area. Having an understanding of urban issues is critical. Lastly, the University of Toledo has an asset in the medical center. With the help of this board, the community, and new visionary leadership, we can keep UTMC open to serve the citizens of the Toledo area.

We look forward to being a resource for the board and working with you all moving forward.

Sincerely,

Senator Teresa Fedor Ohio Senate District 11
Representative Paula Hicks-Hudson Ohio House District 44
Representative Lisa Sobecki Ohio House District 45
Representative Mike Sheehy Ohio House District 46

To the editor: UTMC needs helping hand

Note: this letter was published in the April 24, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

As a south end resident, I had considered the Medical College of Ohio to be a very good neighbor.

When I was a member of the Celiac Support Group, our group met at the medical school, sometimes in classrooms, later in the cafeteria.

When our families needed emergency attention, MCO was where we went. The YMCA operated out of MCO and hosted numerous exercise classes.

It was a sad day to see this fraternity dissolve.

When Southwyck closed, the medical college invited seniors to walk the track at the Morris Center.

I did this for years until I was “uninvited.”

Our old neighbor needs attention. It needs a governance who is committed to her.

Please, let’s all see that she gets it.

PATTY SCHAAL
South Toledo

Blade Editorial: A failed record

Note: this editorial was published in the April 19, 2020 edition of the Toledo Blade.

When the merger of the former Medical College of Ohio with the University of Toledo was proposed it was sold to the Greater Toledo Community as a win-win proposition.

We were told the Medical College would lift up the University of Toledo and benefit the university financially. In turn, the Medical College would gain the support of an entire university and enjoy various organizational synergies.

Hindsight is 20/​20. But it is quite clear, in retrospect, that the merger was a mistake. The medical school has been degraded, and its custom-built campus has been significantly depopulated.

Similarly, when the university struck a partnership with ProMedica back in 2015, we were told that the medical college and its hospital would be augmented by Toledo Hospital and subsidized by ProMedica.

Hindsight makes clear that this too was a mistake. The subsidy never came, and the university hospital was not augmented but superseded and marginalized.

Why did these two steps, announced with such optimism and fanfare, go so wrong?

There is no one explanation. Market forces played a role and some would argue bad faith did. But without question the merger (with the University) and the partnership (with ProMedica) went wrong because of a lack of interest, expertise, and management skill on the part of the UT administration and Board of Trustees.

In short, no one in charge or doing oversight looked out for the medical college and its hospital, at least after Lloyd Jacobs, who ran the medical college and then the university, left the scene.

No one in authority made it his or her business to take care of the medical college campus, its faculty, or medical research.

And no one cared that the university hospital was being abandoned and dismantled.

Now the hospital is for sale, and the president of the university and the board of trustees have made a final decision to sell it without a public process of deliberation or even disclosure, forgetting what the medical college means to the community and how its hospital serves the community, particularly South Toledo.

The whole story is one of indifference and unforgivable incompetence.

What has also been forgotten is that the medical school and its hospital actually belong to the state of Ohio.

So Gov. Mike DeWine has something to say here.

The governor should move to re-establish an independent board for the medical college, even if it stays subservient to the UT board. This board would include people with knowledge of medical education and health care and with a commitment to UTMC. Depending on the breadth and depth of its authority, action by the General Assembly might be required to create the board. It would be worth the effort.

The state must obviously take great interest in who buys the UTMC hospital and under what conditions. But the greatest need now is to establish decent governance and an umbrella of independence and protection for Toledo’s crown jewel.